07.01.12 The Dianne Abbott furore is another example of self protection as a racist society's first port of call ('racism' as a disproportionately evocative label is discussed below too). Again the lack of direct words with which to have a real discussion is in evidence, blocked out by cartoon politicking. In a pompous (debate practiced?) way perhaps and through the strange twitter context she has flagged enduringly relevant truths for this stage in history on this island; the people shouting the loudest for her sacking and worse are the people for whom these truths most strongly bring pyschological discomfort, or are just deep in the opportunistic games of politics and self preservation and looking for a comeback, especially in the afternmath of the SL case. A lot of people feel exposed and upset at any insinuation of racism - a self preservation instinct is very very strong with this issue, almost above all others. This is a good article http://33revolutionsperminute.wordpress.com/2012/01/05/racism-vs-racism-why-d...
03.01.12 I am not racist, but the institution is' is a huge cop out. Openness is needed not more classification.
Rowan Williams, ‘The fragility of our pictures of ourselves as a liberal, tolerant and settled society’. These words themselves explain the lie. LIBERAL, TOLERANT, these words themselves even suggest a power balance where one kind (empowered) speaks for another (subjugated or at least represented). They are outmoded, and arguably arrogant throwbacks to the era Dianne Abbott had to pretend she was talking about to say what she meant.
Killing ‘every black cunt, every Paki, every copper’ (said the gang member). This case is important too for the words. The worst possible words come out, they have been the thing most hidden. The words have been coming out in the youtube videos of racist diatribes lately too. Their hatred is extinguished when they enter the wider world, because they are nonsensical. The real danger is the people that do not express their uninvestigated fears. And what is really being expressed in all racism if it is not fear?
Institutionally racist is the phrase of the moment. This needs to be used carefully because it is another distancing mechanism that says ‘I am not racist, the institution is’. Metropolitan Black Police Association Chairman Bevan Powell said ‘There is still work to be done. It is still institutionally racist, but that doesn’t mean that individual officers are racist’. Self protection first, everywhere.
Dr Stone identified stop and search tactics which disproportionately target young black men. This is a fact. Sentencing also disproportionately punishes black men.‘Institutional racism’ was defined as ‘the collective failure to provide proper policing to people because of their colour, culture and ethnic origin.’ Discrimination seen through ‘unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness and racist stereotyping.'
Also known as the inability of society to say ‘I don’t know’, ask questions or be open about the fact that other races and new communities can shake a sense of identifiable ‘self’ and evoke a self protective response? The relationship between what it means to be a citizen in a sovereign state and the base level of living standard worldwide must be recognised in this argument. We can't pretend everything is solvable in our own little state, tensions fester because of an incongruity between what happens at home, and our relation to other human beings around the planet.
For real wholescale change to happen, the ‘who and what’ we are (NATION STATE, INDIVIDUAL, RELATIVE POWER HOLDER, ECONOMIC CELL) will all have to change. Revolution is the only word for it.[Is this true or can the revolution happen entirely from an individual without any changes in the superstructure in which the individual lives?]
The DAILY MAIL editor Paul Dacre (link to mail website) woke up in 1997 ‘drenched in sweat’ convinced his career was over when publishing a famous front page. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2081736/Stephen-Lawrence-trial-verdict-Paul-Dacre-Daily-Mail-editor-shares-views.html
LOTS OF PEOPLE JUMPING ON THIS BANDWAGON ALREADY, artists, journos, money makers. Dangers of new cartoon versions of the issues replacing the last cartoon versions of the issues.
Doreen Lawrence, ‘Racism still exists but it is not so overt’. This is not progress.
Racism, Economics, Equilibrium, Liberalism
And who's the one we talk about still? Orwell. Eton educated Orwell, saw it from the top, didn't like his family, felt affronted enough by the private world to address the public one.
My gut reaction after initial shock was one of compassion for the racist in the example of a mother ranting wildly at a train full of people (link) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNs-bGPlvSo. This was my honest reaction. She was lost, her child wasn’t even phased by her behaviour, in among the vitriolic nonsense was the odd truth ‘whos black and whos white (anyway)’ she slurred.
A human being in pain was lashing out and not making sense at all, other than that she felt that at some level a social organisation that she had been sold as an ideal had been changed. Life within that social structure had got very much harder, she felt. A loosening of border and racial mix co-incided with this added feel of struggle. On a human level, the violence she expressed to fellow human beings is judgable in harsh terms, her choice of argument is hateful. In the wrong words she expresses something that is happening though. Our economic lies are unravelling. Sitting in a train carriage with people from 27 different countries is a representation of sorts of the unravelling of a power balance that 'we' have taken as fact for a long time. Racism exists precisely and because it has served in the past to keep the division clean between positions in the economic power balance. Those that have 'defeated' the racist premise have traditionally done so by playing the powerful at their own game, being more white than the white man.
So we exist in a power balance, all of us. Can we treat every next man as our brother and get on in the world, the way the world is currently set up?
First posted August 8th 2011
Note: This has not been designed as a response to rioting; the response of many people to footage on mainstream news will absolutely be relevant to this though.
I've just spoken to a friend who is witnessing rioting in Clapton as it is happening tonight and he reminded me of an essay I started concerning race and urged me to finish it; I think it would take a lot of work to link what I had written to the wider context of life within our social system and wider contexts still (which the subject demands and deserves) or to attempt to align it with the incredible events of the last couple of days in London, but I think he is right that the issues are boiling just now in a way they haven't before. What follows is an 'abstract' of sorts. Any comment would be most welcome as ever.
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:52:39 +0000
Storekeepers of their own self image. Shopfronts of their own image. I am not racist is the wrong response to 'there is racism'. 'Why and how is there racism' is the right response. Examine your own attitudes directly. If you jump to say 'I am not racist because...' I suggest it is because sub consciously you recognise that you are or have been racist, or at the very least have been soaked in racist premise and taken on some small part of the atmosphere, even if that has evoked strong countering activity. The very word itself lacks precise definition (the same as multiculturalism in fact) and can evoke counterclaim that ranges wildly as a protestation of innocence from a multitude of subdivisions, and from national front activist to charity development worker. It doesn't necessarily follow that you are at the 'bad' end of a moral spectrum but it does follow that you may not be the person you tell yourself you are, however earnestly. This is a barrier that people find extremely uncomfortable. Examining your own attitudes is very difficult, admitting that they have been subtly engrained is painful and requires breakdown to address. I also suggest that almost all people are or have been racist in as much as they have pre judged an image of 'other' in a person, real or imagined (and also derogatory or adoring), based on that person's otherness of skin colour, language or other such marker and this is the important part, this sense of 'other' is informed in potentially very complex ways around the very notion of a history of 'racism'; an implied order of things based on control and systems of abstract world ordering or entitlement. Even while the systems break, the attitudes continue, and the worst kind of force is the one that denies this uncomfortable state. I suggest that we have all denied this uncomfortable state at some level and with some section of local or global society. Breaking down the psychologies is always complex, as people are so quick to point out in the face of classifications. Being labelled 'racist' is probably the most ethically damaging thing that can be levelled at a person, along with certain other social obsessions that are treated in equally cartoon ways. With racism the value judgement is absolute. Racist is evil, and evil is conscious. 'Race guilt' can be as simplified as a barely recognised feeling of discomfort that at some level sends the brain to that place, 'I must defend myself from this value judgement being made against me', even where there is none. My own realisation came in several waves. First, an empathy level, transferring my own experiences of being denied real identity - not fitting in with family class profile because of a private education and not fitting with peers because of the same fundamentally working class backgroud. Being prejudged by all members of society in other words (the society i had experience of). This allowed me an insight, but not an understanding. I transferred my own experience onto other people, prisoners were one, racially subjugated another. This was enough to suggest to me that i had 'transcended' racism. It set me on a path to learn as much as i could about how things really were, in every sphere of life, and never to accept a story without investigating it myself. How could someone with this attitude ever be labelled racist? Why then, when I started a fundraising job, was I scared initially to approach black men? Why did I assume a woman in a burkha would not give to charity? These feelings of discomfort were manifested racism. The psychologies can be like those of anger and guilt passed down by a bully and the person bullied. A strong reaction against either of these emotions is just as much referential to those emotions as overt and more pernicious forms of racism. Perhaps this could be characterised at the risk of over simplification as the liberal white effect, where white is more the attitude than the skin colour. The argument falters in the face of such people who say 'I am not racist and we are making the world non racist'. Wrong message. Wrong outcome. I understand and recognise a human trait that includes guilt and anger and other classifications that are not actually directly useful to a modern condition is the right answer. Recognising these things widely and openly eventually will debunk their power as storytellers. As soon as people can lose their fear of labels then the real humanity may develop unhindered. And here's the difficult part. Many racist people are filled with the deepest levels of humanity, it is possible to be in both camps. Very few are brought up without a polarisation of some sort about something. Everyone is born with the ability to disassemble and rebuild though.